Thanks. i missed the weight part !!
On 2/5/08, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Atif Sid <> wrote on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:53 AM: > > > I have a static route configured with Higher admin distance, intially > > BGP route does does not install int routing table. after a flap in > > BGP table the static route starts preferring, although the BGP AD is > > lower then Static route which is 210. > > > > any insight is appereciated. > > AD comes into play when a route is known via multiple sources. In your > case, BGP will prefer the redistributed static route due to its higher > weight over the vpnv4 route you receive via iBGP (weight wins over > localpref). To solve this (somewhat classical) problem, make sure you > set the weight to zero (using a route-map) when redistributing the > floating static into BGP (or set the weight of the ibgp vpnv4 prefixes > to 32768). This way, BGP will prefer the iBGP path, installs it in the > RIB, and this one wins over the floating static. > > oli > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
