what code was this in? thanks for the info as well, from this and all the responses of my other fwsm thread, i am finding out tons of useful information :)
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Peter Rathlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I can see there was a thread from May 2006 about the FWSM and TTL > decrements. The FWSM doesn't show up in traceroutes because of this, and > that is sometimes not good seen from a debugging perspective. > > Does anybody know if this has been "corrected" in the meantime? Is there > really no way of having the FWSM decrement TTL and send back > unreachables for traffic passing through it? > > Regards, > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
