Mark Tinka wrote: > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Kim Onnel wrote: > >> Plus it would be unfair to compare price and performance >> of 7600 to an M320 and Juniper would never put an M7i or >> M10 as P, so its all about Positioning not just 'pure >> technical' judgement. > > This depends on the size and complexity of the network. > > I'm sure many a (small) network would consider an M7i, M10i > (or for that matter, 7206-VXR) as a good-enough core > router, given their needs.
I have seen M10i positioned by Juniper as P routers in environments where modest amount of GE/SONET connectivity is required (e.g. small regional sites). _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
