I am running 12.2(18)SXF12 in my lab and BPDU's are being switched OK over EoMPLS...
CE2#show spanning-tree vlan 200 VLAN0200 Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee Root ID Priority 32968 Address 0005.ddc0.0d00 Cost 4 Port 11 (GigabitEthernet0/11) Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Bridge ID Priority 32968 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 200) Address 000c.cec0.2900 Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Aging Time 300 Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type ------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- -------------------------------- Gi0/11 Root FWD 4 128.11 P2p CE2# ccielab#5 [Resuming connection 5 to ce1 ... ] CE1#sh CE1#show sp CE1#show spanning-tree vl CE1#show spanning-tree vlan 200 VLAN0200 Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee Root ID Priority 32968 Address 0005.ddc0.0d00 This bridge is the root Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Bridge ID Priority 32968 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 200) Address 0005.ddc0.0d00 Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Aging Time 300 Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type ------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- -------------------------------- Gi0/11 Desg FWD 4 128.11 P2p CE1# Bill Murphy Senior Network Analyst University of Texas Health Science Center - Houston 6901 Bertner, Suite 432 Houston, TX 77030 Office: (713) 500-9947 Fax: (713) 500-0272 Mobile: (832) 594-0136 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 8:46 AM To: Mateusz Błaszczyk; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] [ME6524] port based EoMPLS Mateusz Blaszczyk <> wrote on Monday, February 25, 2008 2:00 PM: > List, > > I would like to report a problem with ME6524s that I have in the > testlab network at the moment. > I am testing them since 4 weeks now and I hit a big show stopper. > > At the moment I am concetrated on EoMPLS and checking the port-based > (Type 5) EoMPLS cross-connects. > I am questioning their transparency. [..] you might be hitting CSCsm70349 (BPDU traffic over Eompls is not switched on 3C system). Can you try downgrading to 12.2(33)SXH or 12.2(18)SXF<something> to verify as the above bug seems to be a regression in SXH1 specifically? oli _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/