Dale Shaw <> wrote on Friday, March 07, 2008 9:26 AM:
> G'day oli,
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Can you try adding "match interface" to the NAT route-maps? I.e.
>>
>> route-map App01-NAT-FOO1 permit 10
>> match ip address 125
>> match interface Serial0/1.742
>
> Sigh! Thanks -- that was it. I was under the mistaken impression
> "match interface" was a match on the source/input interface. I blame a
> colleague :-)
>
> Can you explain why "match interface" works but "match ip next-hop"
> didn't? Is "match ip next-hop" not applicable to NAT route-maps?
match ip next-hop should also work. Not sure why it didn't, would need
to see the full config.. but in your case, I'd work with interfaces
(also use "set interface" in PBR route-map)..
oli
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
