Or ES20 linecards (cheaper per port than SPAs but still expensive when compared to other Ethernet linecards that can't do VPLS).
Also, you should skip the Sup720-3BXL and get the RSP720-3CXL for the same $$. And you should also get your 67xx linecards with DFCs that match the Sup as well. It's worth the added expense. Justin Pavel Baleshenko wrote: > Him Paul > > Yes, Sup720-3BXL can do MPLS. > But you need SIP with SPAs for VPLS. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:00 PM > Subject: [c-nsp] 7600 Questions > > >> Hi folks.. >> >> >> >> Some very helpful people yesterday answered some questions on whether to >> go >> GSR or 7600/Sup720 - we are looking at a pair of 7600's now with >> Sup720-3BXL >> cards primarily for BGP and core routing functions. >> >> >> >> Can Sup720-3BXL do MPLS or is this dependant on the line cards? Our >> thoughts are oriented around VPLS type of services. >> >> >> >> I've read that the Sup720-3BXL can hold 1 million routes in the tables vs >> 256,000 on other platforms - true?? We're looking at splitting up 3 >> transit >> providers and a couple hundred peers across them.. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
