Pshem, > > Can I ask why 2 VPLSes instead of one? Is there any technical reasons ? > > > The main one is so BPDUs from CSW3 and CSW4 can't reach CSW1 at the > same over the same link - a single VPLS cloud would act like a hub > without spanning tree, forwarding packets in every direction that > effectively would stop the L2 network.
So if you do a split like this why using VPLS? why not EoMPLS xconnects (2x) ? Best Regards, -- -mat _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
