Hi, On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:29:13PM +0300, Ziv Leyes wrote: > I want to set an appointment with you in, let's say 10 years from today and > we can talk it over again? > Do you know how many of the IPv4 "allocated" addresses aren't actually in use > and are only held at the LIRs and RIRs IP "storage basement" for future use? > This could happen in the future too, a single person can apply for a million > IPv6 addresses and perhaps he will get them, because "there are som many, so > what the heck, let him have 'em?" > We'll see, I hope I'm wrong?
Actually every user of IPv6 *will* get "millions" (2^64...2^80, depending
on ISP assignment size). That's the point.
Before making public claims like yours, try to read up a bit on what the
current approaches *are*, and how the numbers work out.
"IPv6 won't work!" (and its variants) isn't going to stop IPv4 depletion -
get over it, and start helping to fix the remaining open issues around
IPv6. "Not enough addresses" isn't one of them. Non-deployment is.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgplZXpRjBk59.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
