Lasher, Donn wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Jose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 6:02 PM > To: Lasher, Donn > Cc: Cisco; Gerald Krause > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 support for jumbo frames > > >> Donn, what version of code were you using? This is pretty scary >> considering that one of the factors of going to NPE-G1 is hoping to >> > take > >> advantage of jumbo frame or at least 1530 on the three ports. >> > > This behavior occurred under every code revision we tested on the > NPE-G2's, which was, 12.4.11T, and 12.2.3x-SB trains. It worked fine on > the PA-FE-TX cards under the same train, just not on the onboard ports. > > Again, once the port is forced to 1000, either fiber or copper, any MTU > up to 9216 wasn't a problem (assuming your switch can handle it). Forced > at 100 however, it wouldn't exceed 1500+overhead, which breaks 1500 > unfragged inside an MPLS VPN. > Are you sure this affects the NPE-G1 ?
I've never personally tested on an NPE-G2, but this NPE-G1 is fine: thnlon-pe01#sh int gi 0/1 | i Gi|MTU|uplex GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up MTU 1546 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, Full Duplex, 100Mbps, media type is RJ45 thnlon-pe01#sh ver | i NPE Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G1) processor (revision B) with 983040K/65536K bytes of memory. thnlon-pe01#sh ver | i 12.2 Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRC, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) Also worked on 12.3.22 Enterprise adam. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
