Netscreen 5400 15x the 3des performance, 2.5x number of tunnels and SUB 1 second stateful failover arent compelling enough reasons?
Brandon -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 6:15 AM To: Masood Ahmad Shah Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series) Hi, > If you really need a firewall thn you must go for Netscreen. Netscreen > is a truly firewall with pretty nice/stable packet inspection engine > and pretty nice GUI/Command line interface. even against ASA 5580-40 ? can someone point me to a compelling reason to think of a netscreen instead of such a box? alan _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
