On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008, Charles Glass wrote: > > > Testing with Squid (2 caches) and mask assignment I was able to get 32 > > mask values per cache. The weight attribute did not appear to have any > > effect on distribution of the mask values as it does with hash > > assignment. > > Then use squid. :) > > > > I would like to use mask assignment for obvious reasons but having > > only 3 mask values per cache is not feasible. > > > > Thanks for the info on this it is greatly appreciated. > > You're just not going to get sensible performance scaling on these > devices without the whole path being in hardware.
agreed. > > (ObNote; I haven't touched or adminned WCCPv2 on a 7600 w/ ES modules; > I've just touched it on the 6500 and I've heard lots of stories from > 7600 + squid users. :) > Thanks for the response, much appreciated :) _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
