On Friday 18 April 2008, Lincoln Dale wrote: > obviously the recommendation would ba NAMED ACL every > time.
Except for where you can't use them, e.g., NTP access groups. But yes, we prefer named access lists as well, if not for anything else than their manageability, and use them wherever they are supported. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
