Hi, On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:39:53AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote: > Sounds like an argument for doing something stateless like sFlow for > statistics instead of flogging the NetFlow horse.
This very much depends on your needs. If you need detailed records for
billing purposes, sFlow (or sampled NetFlow) is just not good enough.
For basic "what's going on?" detection, sflow/sampled netflow is fine.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp6c0z0AHgaR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
