No mention of the version nightmare that is IOS either. For a given platform, there are at least 3-5 compatible branches to choose from and no clear direction of when to choose what fork (other than fumbling with feature navigator or opening a ticket). E.g. an ISR may have various X flavors, T and mainline, and ship with a T train for who knows why. 7200 is much worse.
On 4/18/08, Tom Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice Cisco poked at Junipers ScreenOS... > > Cisco has/had CatOS, and has PIX and ASA operating systems, which look > and feel completely different to IOS, so they dont neccessarily get > off the hook that easily. :-) > > Tom > > On 18/04/2008, at 1:53 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > > Sure to start a religious war but I am just pointed readers to the > > article: > > > http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/041708-cisco-juniper-operating-systems.html?ts0hb=&story=wknd_wir > > http://www.networkworld.com/slideshows/2008/041708-junos-vs-ios.html > > > http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/041708-cisco-juniper-operating-systems-side.html > > > > -Hank > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
