Thanks for the info! We should get someone to open a feature request... Chris
On 5/9/08, Darryl Dunkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is what local backup logins are for, you can revert to passwords in > the rare case it is needed (while having the convenience the other 99.9% > of the time). Same deal with TACACS, if your servers are unreachable, > you can still login using a local login/password from the NVRAM. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin Whittaker > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:41 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SSH Authoized Keys? > > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 04:59:52PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote: > > I've never heard a good justification from Cisco as to why. Does > anyone > > know if a bug/feature request was ever opened? > > The answer I have heard from Cisco is that doing so would place a > runtime dependancy on the storage. > It is reasonably safe to erase the nvram and format the flash on a > running box. If your authorised keys file was on the flash or nvram then > it failing would lock you out of the device. > > You could put the keys into the config but the config could get messy. > > Colin > -- > Colin Whittaker +353 (0)86 8211 965 > http://colin.netech.ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
