Hi all Partially correct :)
The thing you are reffering to is a statement in the docs that states that in order to utilize 50 ap'on the 4402 you need to connect both interfaces. The maximum number of access points that is allowed on a single port on the 4402 is 48 Best regards Tor-Ivar Kristoffersen -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Jeff Cartier Sendt: 21. mai 2008 20:27 Til: Higham, Josh; [email protected] Emne: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco WCL- 4402 - Max AP & LAG Thanks for the reply Josh! I understand your statement below, and I agree with it 100% with the understanding that your referencing a scenario with a 4404. Unfortunately our customer has purchased a 4402... -----Original Message----- From: Higham, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:26 PM To: Jeff Cartier; [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Cisco WCL- 4402 - Max AP & LAG > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Cartier > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco WCL- 4402 - Max AP & LAG > > I've heard somewhere...and possibly read somewhere that in > order to get > the full 50 AP allotment out of a Cisco Wireless LAN Controller 4402 > model, 50 AP, you have to Port-Channel/LAG the two Gigabit ports > together. Not correct, to my knowledge. We have the 4404 100 AP units and none of our channels are bonded. During the AP discovery process the controller assigns the AP to a given port to maintain distribution, so I can't see any reason why it would be necessary to have them bonded. Thanks, Josh _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
