Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the "old" days, null was handled by CPU (software switched), so lots > of us old-timers got into the habit of using loopback instead of > null. On a modern platform it should make no operational difference > provided you have everything you need set up properly. (null routing > the /16, for example, might be bad if you ever actually try to route > that whole prefix instead of just subs -- as it would be specific and > static).
That's why you put a high distance metric on static pull-up routes. Any "real" static routes or connected interfaces will override ip route 192.148.252.0 255.255.254.0 Loopback0 240 -r _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
