Hi
2008/6/19 Peter Rathlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well, AFAIK "default-information originate" is needed to advertise > defaults also in VRFs. But if PE1 and PE2 are the same HW/SW that > shouldn't be the case here, i.e. 0.0.0.0/1 doesn't seem to be considered > a "default". > > If I understand it correctly, for a label to be assigned by the router > the prefix needs to exist in the RIB "on itself". If the route from PE1, > and not the locally generated route, is installed in the RIB, and the > route uses Default-IP-Routing-Table as next hop via a > Loopback-to-Loopback LSP (L3VPN) you won't have a local label. > > The route from PE1 is preferred since BGP admin distance is less than > the 250 assigned to the static. The question here is why is there no label on PE1 at all? It has a locally connected interface that gets into bgp using a network statement - it should generate a label for it. Unless I'm completely wrong here ... kind regards Pshem _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
