On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 09:30 +0200, Garry wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something here, but what's the "right" way of routing > between VRF and non-VRF interfaces?
Not doing it. ;-) > I know that something like this works: > > ip route vrf MYVRF 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 gig1/0 192.168.123.1 > > Anyway, this requires the data being routed out of the router and > towards another one ... I've tried different things to keep the actual > transition between VRF and non-VRF on the same router, but have failed, > either by the router denying what I tried to put in, or it not working > ... docs didn't seem to contain any other info, either, or I didn't find > the correct document ... > > so, what am I missing here? The "global" keyword may get you a little further. Take a look at "Internet Access from an MPLS VPN Using a Global Routing Table" http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk428/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801445fb.shtml http://tinyurl.com/3wkqo3 It has some information on crossing the VRF/non-VRF boundary. What are you trying to achieve by the way? Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
