-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sukumar, this is not actually a linecard, this is the supervisor itself
(SUP720-3BXL) hence only two gigabit ports and none spare :(

I will ask the TAC to consider an RMA, many thanks for your help.

Dave.


Sukumar Subburayan (sukumars) wrote:
> David, 
> 
> Unfortunately, there is no publicly available doc to interpret this data, as 
> much of these are very Hardware (ASIC) centric information, which cannot make 
> sense unless one has the ASIC specification.
> 
> The Pinnacle ASIC register dump you did was the right one. If you see those 
> errors incrementing in large number (these are clear on read), you should 
> consider replacing the LC.
> 
> Not sure what exact Linecard type you have.
> 
> As a workaround, you can try moving the physical port to any other ports 
> other than what is controlled by port asic 0, as that is what is picking up 
> these errors.
> 
> 
> sukumar
> (sent from Good mail)
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         David Freedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 04:48 AM Pacific Standard Time
> To:   Sukumar Subburayan (sukumars)
> Cc:   Rubens Kuhl Jr.; Jeff Fitzwater; [email protected]
> Subject:      Re: [c-nsp] 12.2(33)SXH
> 
> Sukumar, I opened a TAC case already about this but nobody has come back
> to me yet.
> 
> Can you point me to a document which explains how to interpret this
> data? is it publically available?
> 
> Also, I do not know how to get this information any other way,
> This is all I have:
> 
> From the 6500:
> 
> 6500#sh int g7/1 | in rror|drop|throt
>   Input queue: 1/2000/53/53 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
>      0 runts, 352555400 giants, 0 throttles
>      0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
>      10 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
> 6500#sh int g7/2 | in rror|drop|throt
>   Input queue: 0/2000/902/901 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output
> drops: 0
>      0 runts, 1429767336 giants, 1 throttles
>      0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
>      0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
> 6500#remote command switch show plat hard asicreg PINNACLE Slot 7 port 1
> error-counters print-non-zero
>         PINNACLE 7/1
>                 0158:                  PI_PN_S_CRC_ERR_CNT_REG = 00FF
>         PINNACLE 7/1
>                 016F:                     PI_CI_S_CBL_DROP_REG = 0001
> 
> 6500#remote command switch show plat hard asicreg PINNACLE Slot 7 port 2
> error-counters print-non-zero
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From the remote partner (GSR1) with link G7/1:
> 
> GSR1# sh int g1/1/8 | in rror|drop|throt
>   Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/2000, 0 drops
>      Received 18 broadcasts, 0 runts, 3958399257 giants, 0 throttles
>      0 input errors, 10 CRC, 10 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
>      0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
> 
> From the remote partner (GSR2) with link G7/2:
> 
> GSR2#sh int g1/1/7 | in rror|drop|throt
>   Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/2000, 0 drops
>      Received 13 broadcasts, 0 runts, 1464946843 giants, 0 throttles
>      104 input errors, 0 CRC, 104 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
>      0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dave.
> 
> 
> Sukumar Subburayan (sukumars) wrote:
>> I might have missed the original post from David Freedman on :
>>
>>  "CONST_DIAG-SP-4-ERROR_COUNTER_WARNING"
>>
>> Actually, printing this syslog is not a bug. In 12.2(33)SXH onwards, we
>> added 'LinkErrorMonitoring' feature, where
>> Diagnostics proactively checks for various ASIC/port related errors
>> periodically, and would print a syslog when these error
>> Counters exceed threshold.  That is exactly what the customer we are
>> seeing in the case below.
>>
>> In this particular case, the error indicates, that there was 3484 Count
>> of Packet with CRC Error when packet was 
>> Transmitted on the network from a port belonging to port ASIC (Pinnacle)
>> 0.
>>
>> A TAC case is in order, to investigate further if any issues are seen in
>> the network related to this. I am sure the customer
>>  would have seen these errors even in SXF code, but simply diagnostics
>> was not monitoring and reporting these errors in that release.
>>
>>  CSCsm84257 fix should be in SXH3, scheduled tentatively for release end
>> of next month.
>>
>>
>>  sukumar
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Jr.
>> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 6:48 AM
>> To: Jeff Fitzwater
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12.2(33)SXH
>>
>> "CONST_DIAG-SP-4-ERROR_COUNTER_WARNING - SXH problems?"
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/89241?do=post_view_threa
>> ded
>>
>> "SXH2a broken with non-MDT SAFI peers"
>> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2008-May/050891.html
>>
>> Add to those the one from Oliver Gorwits today:
>> "CSCsm84257 (enabling NetFlow causes reload) on SXH2 on 6500 platform"
>>
>>
>> Rubens
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Jeff Fitzwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Rubens, what issues do you mean?  I am running H2a on 5 720-cxls.
>>>
>>> Very interested!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jeff Fitzwater
>>> OIT Network Systems
>>> Princeton University
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 22, 2008, at 6:20 PM, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> After less than enthusiastic responses to 12.2(33)SXH2a (see the two 
>>>> messagens in the cisco-nsp archives about it), have anyone got a 
>>>> timetable to SXH3 or SXH2b ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rubens
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> 
> 


- --
David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Limited
http://www.clara.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIX5U4tFWeqpgEZrIRAs4zAJoCd+r+vCSQoeESVPjr8fNzPtSg7gCfXYNj
sCHiwy1GoupKeGD8kEyiHF4=
=90TL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to