Very much an upgrade judging from the following table. More than double
the PPS & Mbps for Fast/CEF switched packets:-
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
Would be interesting to know the cause of the issue though,
Paul.
Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi there...
We have some remote sites with 2621XM's running today. These routers are
doing PPPOE termination primarily for 40-60 users. The 2621XM is handling
the load just fine however we've been having random problems with them
lately and wanted to swap out the 2621XM for a different, more current model
to see if the problem goes away (traffic just stops passing on the FE
interfaces after a few weeks - tried multiple IOS versions - happening at
several sites).
My question is whether or not an 1841 would be a downgrade or an upgrade for
PPS and overall load? Or should we just bite the bullet and get 2801's
instead?
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
HEAnet Limited
Ireland's Education & Research Network
5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1, Ireland
Tel: +353.1.6609040
Web: http://www.heanet.ie
Company registered in Ireland: 275301
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
