Hi, On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 06:14:46PM -0300, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: > I think such rings would be better served by using REP (Cisco) or > EAPS(Extreme)
You've made me curious, so I went and looked what REP is, hoping for
great innovation - and I find myself somewhat disappointed, it seems to
be "something similar to RPVST or MST, just incompatible".
Since it still disables a port (instead of using all links available
in the network, using L2 SPF 'routing', like HP's mesh technology does),
I can't see an immediate advantage of REP vs. RPVST or MST...?
curious,
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpefVSoVeTi9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
