-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If it's a thinclient, isn't it running firmware or something else
that you are probably not going to be able to load anything onto (the
endpoint) component anyways?
I would look into some sort of authentication to lock the ports
down. If there's no real O/S on the client endpoint then there's
little point in loading any kind of posture-checking... there won't
be a posture to check.
Scott
On Jul 25, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Felix Nkansah wrote:
Hi,
An enterprise customer of mine is replacing all workstations/PCs in
their
network with thin-clients.
They require a NAC-like solution, one that provides posture
assessments and
remediation for the thin-client users.
AFAIK, Cisco's present NAC offering doesnt seem to fit into this
requirement
here (posture assessment for terminal services-like workstations). The
required solution would have to assess the various user virtual
systems for
compliance (patches, viruses, etc) before allowing them to operate.
Please let me know if you have deployed a posture assessment and
remediation
solution for this kind of scenario?
Links would also be appreciated.
Regards,
Felix
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkiL7ikACgkQA7TpMPAlvEdtZwCfRfnR2anUOaFp1Mj0LbwBUQO3
f+cAn1JJQ+0cQKXJYXDo4q/qhU1FHNUK
=zsAP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
