I've seen it before where it does when the chipset resets the driver when say the tx ring is adjusted. For all, that I can remember, we were able to workaround that to prevent the link flap with some code changes.
Read..ideally we don't want to flap the interface and cause a reconvergence event for routing. To expect no packet loss is unrealistic if you have to reset the tx ring. Rodney On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 05:55:05AM +0800, Shaun wrote: > Does removing or adding CBWFQ on an interface drop the link? Or does it > depend on traffic levels? Type of interface? I have had opinions both ways. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
