>> 12000. ME6524 seems a good fit for this environment, J-2320/6350 could >> be the J-land options to explore (although ISR 38x5 are their >> counterparts at C-land, not the ME6524). > > QoS in PE and catalyst doesn't seem good fit to me. Unless you have > dedicated port to each customer. But in view most all PE usages > include customers in VLAN, in which case, to do any QoS, you > need HQoS, which LAN cards can not do. They are cheap for > a reason.
"mls qos vlan-based" can be turned on to do PFC-QoS on VLANs... (at least on PFC3C, but I thought it was supported on other PFC3 releases). HQoS is nice for building services like "25% of the bandwidth has voice priority, if no voice traffic present you can go up to 100%, if more than 25% is voice than only 25% will have expedite forwarding", but if you provide simple CIR/PIR services per VLAN, differentiating needs by different VLANs, what could be achieved by HQoS that PFC-QoS would do only by dedicating a port ? Rubens Rubens _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
