Michael,
 
Would you also require any QOS policies (especially hierarchical
policing with shaping)?
 
Arie


________________________________

        From: Michael Malitsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 16:31 PM
        To: Arie Vayner (avayner); [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [c-nsp] CPE for IPSEC
        
        

        Arie,
        
        Thanks for the response.  200Mb is the aggregate bandwidth
available on the WAN port at each site.  Even if I knew what the typical
traffic rates were today, the application group would change something
tomorrow, so I have to design for the worst case - 390kpps using 64-byte
packets.
        I phrased the original question the way I did because the specs
for the ASA and VAM are written in bits-per-second rather than
packets-per-second.  In either case, I am curious how close does real
world come to the specs?
        
        Thanks,
        Michael Malitsky
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Arie Vayner (avayner) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Tue 8/5/2008 3:51 AM
        To: Michael Malitsky; [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [c-nsp] CPE for IPSEC
        
        Michael,
        
        A few questions:
        
        1. I see you mention 225Mbps, but what is the packet-per-second
rate?
        This is actually a more important factor, as router performance
is
        usually PPS-rate based
        2. Is 225M the total hub rate, or is it per spoke?
        
        In general, I would suggest getting the HW encryption option
(VAM in the
        7200 case) as it would provide a more deterministic latency as
        encryption would be done in dedicated HW.
        
        Arie
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Malitsky
        Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 01:36 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [c-nsp] CPE for IPSEC
        
        Greetings,
        
        The auditors are trying to force me to encrypt our WAN traffic.
The WAN
        in question is Cogent's ethernet service - built as a mesh of
        point-to-point VLANs.  There are 3 sites, at every site I have a
single
        port over which I receive 2 VLANs in a dot1q trunk.  Aggregate
bandwidth
        on the port is 200Mbps.  Putting in encryption seems fairly
        straightforward - 3 static IPSEC tunnels.  I am trying to figure
out
        what kind of hardware can handle IPSEC at this bandwidth.  So
far I am
        looking at:
        -ASA5520.  Specs say 225Mb of IPSEC - can the box actually
handle that,
        or should I be looking at 5540?
        -7201 (or 7206) with NPEG2.  Do I need to add a VAM, or will the
NPE
        handle the load?
        
        Any real-world experiences will be most appreciated.  Also, if
there are
        better suggestions (including non-Cisco), please share.
        
        Thanks,
        Michael Malitsky
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
        https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
        archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
        
        

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to