Hi all, I resolve this put the source to a route-map.
tks all... On 6/19/08, Everton Diniz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, > I have statics entries for nat. > > ip nat inside source static 10.180.26.153 10.180.20.153 > ip nat inside source static 10.180.52.70 172.30.170.201 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.52.71 172.30.170.202 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.53.70 172.30.170.203 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.53.71 172.30.170.204 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.54.70 172.30.170.205 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.54.71 172.30.170.206 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.57.70 172.30.170.207 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.57.71 172.30.170.208 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.57.73 172.30.170.209 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.57.74 172.30.170.210 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.56.70 172.30.170.211 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.180.56.71 172.30.170.212 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.210 172.30.170.221 extendable > ip nat inside source static 10.1.1.211 172.30.170.222 extendable > > On 6/19/08, Wink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are there other NAT statements in your config? > > > > Everton Diniz wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a crazy router that do Nat for a deny entry on ACL. Whyyyy??? > > > > > > > > > ip nat pool nat-pool 10.250.63.2 10.250.63.254 netmask 255.255.255.0 > > > ip nat inside source list permit-nat pool nat-pool > > > Extended IP access list permit-nat > > > 10 deny ip host 10.180.20.70 host 10.180.50.201 log > > > 20 deny ip host 10.180.20.96 host 10.180.50.201 log > > > 30 deny ip host 10.180.20.159 host 10.180.50.201 log > > > 40 deny ip 10.180.0.0 0.0.255.255 host 10.180.50.201 log (242 matches) > > > 50 permit ip 10.180.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.252.0.0 0.1.255.255 log > > > 60 deny ip any any log (108 matches) > > > > > > tcp 10.250.63.14:2984 10.180.20.70:2984 10.180.50.201:8080 > > 10.180.50.201:8080 > > > > > > Version 12.3(8)T5 > > > > > > Anyone has the same problem? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Everton > > > _______________________________________________ > > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
