On (2008-08-11 07:41 +0200), Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: > BTW: the LDP filter only prevents advertisement of the binding, it > doesn't prevent the LSR from assigning a label (the imp-null in your > example).
I think we had this discussion some years ago, but it would be nice, instead of ACLs to be able to say 'no mpls ldp label; mpls ldp label loop0' or so, to generate label only for loop0. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
