Hi, > >Wanted to poll the SP folks here to understand what you do "in the Core" for >supporting Tele Presence traffic on LLQ or CBWFQ? Cisco says LLQ but i don't >agree because TP is a VBR traffic. And LLQ has its cost implications.
Problem with CBWFQ is that while you'll get a min bandwidth guarantee, there's no guarantee for latency and jitter (probably gotta stay within about 1% pkt loss, 30ms jitter max, and 150ms end-to-end latency, of course, for good quality). So, personally I'd use a priority queue with LLQ for TP (actually, a second priority queue, if available). Mark > >Thanks very much for the feedback > >John.... >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
