hi, is there any exact/rough number of acl which doesn't impact the cpu? or how can we check/make sure that the cpu will not be impacted if the traffic increasing?
Thanks. ./rendo On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Brian Turnbow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We use them and have never experienced problems as long as you keep in the > tcam space. > With too many routes/acls ecc they punt to cpu. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian > MacNevin > Sent: venerdì 15 agosto 2008 6.00 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] 3560 ACL performance? > > Hi > So the marketing machine tells me 3650s do ACLs in hardware and zero > performance hit blah blah. > Anyone had any real world experience with high loads of packets on > every interface under a simple ACL? > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
