48 port 10/100/1000mb EtherModule WS-X6148-GE-TX Bought them without knowing about the 8port 1Gig limit ; We plan to replace this construction next year with a VSS solution, type of 65XX not yet chosen.
Wim Holemans -----Original Message----- From: Eric Cables [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 5 september 2008 18:59 To: Holemans Wim Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FWSM failover transparent mode Not to hijack this thread, but what modules are you using for server connectivity in your 6513? We deployed some 6513s as SF switches long ago (bad decision), and are now swapping them out with the 6509-E chassis due to the need for additional performance (6748s in all slots). -- Eric Cables On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Holemans Wim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just upgraded our FWSM to version 3.1.11 after 3 random crashes in a > month. Now we are thinking about buying a second FWSM to do failover in > order to limit downtime and facilitate upgrades : most of our servers > are connected to the 6513 carrying this FWSM. > > We use the 2 standard virtual contexts of the FWSM, both in transparent > mode, 8 bridged vlans on one, 2 bridged vlans on the second. > > > > In the release notes of 3.1.11 I however read under Open Caveats > > "CSCm73157 : Failover is not working in transparent mode..." > > > > Anyone has experience with FWSM failover in transparent mode ? Does this > really doesn't work ? > > Does it work under 3.2 or 4.0 ? > > > > Any info would be appreciated before we invest more than 15K Euros... > > > > Wim Holemans > > Netwerkdienst Universiteit Antwerpen > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
