Hello! On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:29:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> my initial (and, i guess, current) IPv6 deployment plan > was based on /64 subnets. yes, thats a ridiculous amount > of hosts per subnet...nasty software coded in 'the old style' > might make these very big collision domains and i do worry about > how ISC DHCPv6 will handle such large numbers of leases - > recalling how it deals with /16's in IPv4 land. Don't worry. :) ISC made pretty well dhcp server. We run it to serve huge amount of IPv4 hosts without significant performance patches. Fast and rock-stable. $ cat dhcpd.leases | grep ^lease | wc -l 756910 $ -- Dmitry Kiselev _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
