On Wednesday 17 September 2008 09:24:13 Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: > Cisco 7600 + ES20 are way too expensive on a price/port > perspective. Consider distributing smaller Cisco ME6524 > boxes (which is not as cheap as it used to be, but it is > still lot less than 7600)...
In our consideration for a "small" box capable of handling a large number of EoMPLS VC's, the ME6524 came up - but sadly, we can only think of it in that function, and not a combined L2VPN + IP termination device. This is because it can only support 256,000 v4 routing entries (PFC-3C). Would advise the OP to look at this if he's thinking of carrying full routes on it. If 0/0 is good enough, then no worries. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
