Think LBSSP

- Although Cisco making everything a 'Revenue Enhancement' opportunity puts my teeth on edge Cisco seems to have forgotten how they got to their dominant position mediocre products with GREAT support and reasonable licensing terms. They still have mediocre products but now support is expensive and delivered by call center drones reading from a script and unreasonable licensing terms. It used to be that Cisco was a compromise you could get all your support under one roof and the commonality of the products made the compromise worthwhile now more and more it seems the 'best of breed' approach is called for once again.

The ASA is nowhere near the product the VPN3000 was I can see Cisco not wanting 3 separate hardware platforms for boxes with similar computational capabilities but at least come up with 3 separate images which are optimized for the task at hand NOT this LAME firewall with some VPN stuff thrown in. Case in point we use RRI on our VPN 3000's on the 3000's the RRI modifies the ospf routing table directly. in the ASA the RRI is handled by creating STATIC's so much for 'no redistribute static' if you have a out of band management network and want to handle that routing statically now what was a simple elegant solution which worked for years (7 in our case) now will become a science project with route maps from here to infinity and one that junior engineers will no longer be able to support.

-

Jeff Kell wrote:
Garry wrote:
 ... makes sense
especially for Active/Active standby, as it's more or less load
balancing, too

Bzzzttt!  You can't do VPN in active/active mode, at least with 7.x and
under.  If you can, please tell me how!

Jeff
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to