Is vlan 400 created on the switch? harbor235 ;}
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:05 AM, David Granzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not surre how it works on UC520, but with 3750 (for example) when > you don't have a spanning tree instance for that vlan then the > interface state is up/down. > > 3750-1#sh spanning-tree vlan 24 > Spanning tree instance(s) for vlan 24 does not exist. > > 3750-1#sh int vlan 24 | i Vlan > Vlan24 is up, line protocol is down > > When enabling spanning tree > > 3750-1#sh spanning-tree vlan 24 > > VLAN0024 > Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee > > 3750-1#sh int vlan 24 | i Vlan|Internet address > Vlan24 is up, line protocol is up > Internet address is 1.2.3.4/24 > > 3750-1#ping 1.2.3.4 > > Type escape sequence to abort. > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.2.3.4, timeout is 2 seconds: > !!!!! > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5) > > > Regards, > David > > > > On 10/1/08, Bagosi Rómeó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to force a VLAN interface (ex.: interface vlan 400) to > UP/UP state on a Cisco UC520 (router, switch...), WITHOUT connecting a > device to a port which is in the mentioned VLAN? > > > > The current configuration is: > > int vlan 400 > > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > > show int vlan 400 > > Vlan300 is up, line protocol is down > > ... > > > > Thanks, > > Romeo Bagosi > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
