Stand up a router in your AS that is dedicated for information collection. harbor235 ;}
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Ajeet Bagga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 7, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Ang Kah Yik wrote: > > Hi, >> >> Thanks for sharing your opinion on the disabling of damping as a BCP. >> Yes, this is something that we've taken into consideration. >> >> However, route flap damping is still in use in a number of networks out >> there. >> Thus, we would like to obtain feedback on how the damping of a flap by >> a transit provider may affect our connectivity. >> > > Are you multihomed to this transit? To other upstreams? Depending on the > RFD implementation, withdrawal triggered suppression will indeed affect your > connectivity. For analysis of arguments against RFD, specifically how it > applies to your case, read the sigcomm presentation, < > http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2002/papers/routedampening.html>. > White paper is available via the ACM portal, < > http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=633047>. > > ~ > Ajeet Bagga > Sr. Network Engineer > Cloud Computing Infrastructure and Services > EMC > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
