Slightly off the topic. Is there any advantages for using OSPF for PE-CE routing? Or is it down to what the customer wants? I assume that most operators will use BGP (or maybe EIGRP?)
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: 09 October 2008 08:19 To: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Maximum number of OSPF instances in a VRF-liteenvironment On Wednesday 08 October 2008 17:12:07 Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: > right, this got changed in 12.3(4)T, 12.0(27)S, > 12.2(25)S, 12.2(18)SXE and others where IOS no longer > allocates a PDB per OSPF vrf instance, so you are not > limited by the 32 PDB instances any longer.. Great news! We focus mostly on l2vpn's, but it's good to know this limitation no longer exists if we do get customers insistent on OSPF for a PE-CE routing protocol. I recall IS-IS had the same issue in IOS. Do the new train revisions also include this fix? We are on SRC1 (moving to SRC2). Cheers, Mark. Timothy Arnold Senior Engineer, Network & Security Group, UKSolutions Telephone: 0845 004 1333, option 2 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.uksolutions.co.uk/ UKS Ltd, Birmingham Road, Studley, Warwickshire, B80 7BG Registered in England Number 3036806 This email must be read in conjunction with the legal & service notices on http://www.uksolutions.co.uk/disclaimer _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
