Thanks Luan Can anyone else confirm this also?
Thanks On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Luan Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes you can. I used to do that with 2 VRF-Lites on 2 DMVPN tunnels. > Platform doesn't make any different. > > > Luan Nguyen > Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC. > www.NetCraftsmen.net > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Roberton > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 7:28 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] Fwd: NAT in VRF > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Gary Roberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:13 AM > Subject: NAT in VRF > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > Can someone please confirm for me that you can have the same IP address in > different VRFs natted to different destinations. In other words; > > 217.1.1.1 nat to 10.1.1.1 in VRF A > 217.1.1.1 nat to 192.168.1.1 in VRF B > > I can't see any reason why not. > > What about if using VRF-Lite on a 3845, does that make any difference? > > Its a funny question but I have been asked this and have no access to the > kit to prove it working and I have to have a solid answer. > > Thanks. > > Gary > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
