-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
2008/10/21 Dan Armstrong : > So say I have an SVI on a PE switch which in turn has 2 layer2 links back to > 2 core boxes, the core boxes protected again by a 3rd layer2 link. > > MST will protect me and make sure I always have link to the PE routers & > core routers. What's wrong with using that SVI address in your PE router as > a reference, no need for an IGP down there? > In such a scenario you will always get a suboptimized traffic flow as 1 of the links will be blocked by stp. On the other hand you can create 2 vlans - 1st for coreA 2nd for coreB and load balance the traffic by way of 2 regions... (remember that ptp vlans are not supported by mst) - -- - -mat pgp-key 0x1C655CAB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFI/hUS+BuaDRxlXKsRAn7RAJ4iPXbnGrp+5pHw2StxGG58jTqJEACgk0bP 0PJOQFemLW6K2PsH8zXzelc= =BUOf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/