-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Spade wrote: > Thanks Mark, that thread was very useful and answered my questions. My > question stemmed from an insight into the best practice for this type of > topology. > > Putting aside having to add additional commands for your OSPF configuration, > the only advantage I see of changing the network type from broadcast to > point-to-point is quicker OSPF adjacencies. So all-in-all, it probably > doesn't make too much of a difference changing the default network type for > this topology. >
Really depends on your convergence requirements. For some it's very important, for others not so much. - -- ========= bep -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkECZoACgkQE1XcgMgrtya28wCgxwnqks1vop5OAdKxUrp3ik3R A6EAoP1HPTlyY+taooQlsDTq9Ku1RIEI =d9PC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
