Hi, First create a file in the linux. cd /tftp/ touch xyz(filename) chmod 777 xyz
-------------- in the router: copy run tftp://ipaddress/xyz try it. On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : >Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: IP Cef load sharing, quick question (Peter Rathlev) > 2. Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy (Daniel Lacey) > 3. Re: Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy (Rinse Kloek) > 4. Re: Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation (Rinse Kloek) > 5. Re: Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy (Pete S.) > 6. Re: Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy (Asad) > 7. Re: Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation (Paul Stewart) > 8. Re: help: copy run tftp (Aaron) > 9. Re: help: copy run tftp (Childs, Aaron) > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- - > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:32:31 +0100 > From: Peter Rathlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IP Cef load sharing, quick question >To: Drew Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain > >On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 08:28 -0500, Drew Weaver wrote: > > We have a Simple L3 switch (I think it's a 2960G) that we need to do > > some even simpler fault tolerance and load sharing on. > >They're not 2960s, since those are L2 only. Maybe 3560s? > > > We were going to connect this switch to 3x switches upstream and then > > do something like this: > > > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/32 gwip > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/33 gwip > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/34 gwip > >As Steinar mentions, you should use a specific next hop address. I >assume that the three interfaces are routed ports, or that they use >seperate VLANs. What's upstream? > > > When we were testing we noticed some (well, quite a bit) of strangeness > > with traceroutes and the like (many multiple hops for the same, hop.. > > etc) > >What exactly do you mean with "many multiple hops"? Different answers >for multiple requests with the same TTL (same hop in traceroute) is not >all that unnormal for multiple paths -- each path is elegible for the >traffic, so each next hop router can answer. > >The L3 switches (i.e. not software based routers) typically use a hashed >load sharing algorithm, resulting in per destination or per source (or a >combination) load sharing. They could also include the ports in the >hashing, meaning that a traceroute using a different source port per >probe would result in different next hops. If this is unwanted, you can >change the algorithm to something that doesn't include L4 ports. > > > is there a better way to do what we're trying to achieve? > > > > We were thinking about maybe doing VRRP on the 3 switches upstream but > > then we would only be using 1Gbps and the goal is to be able to use "a > > little more than" 1Gbps. > >You _could_ use GLBP as a load sharing enabled equivalent of VRRP. Don't >know is your hardware/software supports it though. And equal cost >multipath (ECMP) would be my preferred choice if possible. > >Regards, >Peter > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:30:23 -0800 > From: Daniel Lacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy >To: [email protected] >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >Hi all, > >I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters. >I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch. > >I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the other >goes down. >This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues. > >I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a >Multilink bundle? > >Any other suggestions? > >Thanks, >Dan Lacey > > > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:47:35 +0100 > From: Rinse Kloek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy >To: Daniel Lacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: Cisco-nsp <[email protected]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >One option is to configure bot interfaces with the same IP adresses and >settings and use the following command on the primary interface: > >interface GigabitEthernet0/1 > backup interface GigabitEthernet0/2 > ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 > >interface GigabitEthernet0/2 > ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 > >The GigabitEthernet 0/1 will be up and the GigabitEthernet 0/2 will be >standby. If the link on Gi0/1 is going down, Gi0/2 will get up. > >regards Rinse > >Daniel Lacey schreef: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters. > > I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch. > > > > I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the > > other goes down. > > This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues. > > > > I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a > > Multilink bundle? > > > > Any other suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Dan Lacey > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:51:58 +0100 > From: Rinse Kloek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation >To: Paul Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: 'Cisco-nsp' <[email protected]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >Do you use 12.2(33)SRC2 in a box as Aggregation Router ? >One bug we discovered was a Netflow bug wich resulted in crashes >(CSCsu87248) > >kind regards Rinse >Paul Stewart schreef: > > We're running 12.2(33)SRC2 on NPE-2G's with no real issues - we were very > > brave and ran some 12.4T code for a while and had a major issue every 3-4 > > weeks that required a reboot (inbound sessions would just stop coming in > > pretty much via l2tp tunnels). > > > > On the NPE-1G's we're running same release with no issue neither.... > > > > Paul > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rinse Kloek > > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:14 PM > > To: Roddy Strachan > > Cc: Cisco-nsp > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation > > > > What kind of features do you use with the 7206VXR box ? We are also > > looking to upgrade to 12.2.31SB13 because we have some problems with > > 12.2(31)SB6. > > > > regards Rinse > > > > Roddy Strachan schreef: > > > >> Ruben, > >> > >> Funny you mention it. > >> > >> I've just finished an upgrade of a mixture of 7301 and 7206vxr to > >> 12.2(31)SB13. > >> > >> Had a 7301 running in production for 1 week, no issues, the LNS seems a > >> > > lot > > > >> more stable if you ask me. > >> > >> Don't know how the 7206 will go as they have been in production less than > >> > > an > > > >> hour :). > >> > >> So far so good, no real issues to report. > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7/11/08 8:03 AM, "Ruben Alvarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> I'm upgrading IOS on my c7206VXR with an npe-300 and: > >>> UBR7200-I/O-2FE/E > >>> PA-A3-T3= > >>> PA-IMA-T1= > >>> PA-4E= > >>> I'm currently using 122-28.SB2 and noticed a 122-31.SB. Is anyone using > >>> > > the > > > >>> 12.2(31)SB instead of the 12.2(28)SB? I've been looking online and > >>> > > haven't > > > >>> seen much about it. I assume it's got the same features as (28)? If > >>> > > anyone > > > >>> has any feedback let me know. > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > >> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > >> > > addressed. > > > >> Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this > >> email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please note that > >> any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the > >> author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation. > >> Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for > >> the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability for any > >> damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:56:21 -0500 > From: "Pete S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy >To: "Daniel Lacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [email protected] >Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >You can make each port a routed interface(/30 or /31) to the 6500. Control >the failover/load balancing with your IGP. > >--Pete > >On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Lacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters. > > I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch. > > > > I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the other > > goes down. > > This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues. > > > > I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a Multilink > > bundle? > > > > Any other suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Dan Lacey > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 6 >Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:00:49 +0000 > From: "Asad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy >To: "Daniel Lacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected] >Message-ID: > <623938200-1226084442- cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1922886597- @bxe125.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> > >Content-Type: text/plain > >You can try a port-channel and add both interfaces to bundle. This would provide redundancy + more BW. > >Asad >Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > >-----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Lacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:30:23 >To: <[email protected]> >Subject: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy > > >Hi all, > >I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters. >I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch. > >I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the other >goes down. >This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues. > >I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a >Multilink bundle? > >Any other suggestions? > >Thanks, >Dan Lacey > > > > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 7 >Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:09:18 -0500 > From: "Paul Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation >To: "'Rinse Kloek'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: 'Cisco-nsp' <[email protected]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >Yes, that's correct - LAC/LNS > >We don't run Netflow off that box in particular (we do in our core 7600's >though) so haven't come across that bug yet ;) > >Paul > > >-----Original Message----- > From: Rinse Kloek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 1:52 PM >To: Paul Stewart >Cc: 'Roddy Strachan'; 'Cisco-nsp' >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation > >Do you use 12.2(33)SRC2 in a box as Aggregation Router ? >One bug we discovered was a Netflow bug wich resulted in crashes >(CSCsu87248) > >kind regards Rinse >Paul Stewart schreef: > > We're running 12.2(33)SRC2 on NPE-2G's with no real issues - we were very > > brave and ran some 12.4T code for a while and had a major issue every 3-4 > > weeks that required a reboot (inbound sessions would just stop coming in > > pretty much via l2tp tunnels). > > > > On the NPE-1G's we're running same release with no issue neither.... > > > > Paul > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 8 >Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:57:05 -0500 > From: Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] help: copy run tftp >To: Garry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [email protected] >Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >Create the file in your tftp dir using touch... >touch <filename> >then >chmod 777 <filename> >Then you will should be good to go > >Note that this file is world readable and writable.. > >Aaron > >On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Garry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > adrian kok wrote: > > > router#copy running-config tftp > > > Address or name of remote host []? 192.168.0.3 > > > Destination filename [router-confg]? > > > TFTP: error code 1 received - File not found > > > > > Did you allow the TFTP-Clients to create new files? If not, you will > > have to create the file first with sufficient rights for the TFTP- Server > > to overwrite, than copy again. > > > > > > -garry > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 9 >Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:54:59 -0500 > From: "Childs, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] help: copy run tftp >To: adrian kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] be1.ads.wsc.ma.edu> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >Hi Adrian, > Add -c to the server_args. This will allow the tftp clients create the file. > >Aaron >----------- >Aaron Childs >Assistant Director, Networking >Westfield State College >http://www.wsc.ma.edu/it/ >________________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of adrian kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 7:52 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [c-nsp] help: copy run tftp > >Hi > >I install tftp server in linux and it is running > >router#copy running-config tftp >Address or name of remote host []? 192.168.0.3 >Destination filename [router-confg]? >..... >%Error opening tftp://192.168.0.3/router-confg (Timed >out) > >After checking tftp server in 192.168.0.3, I fix it to >allow the router connect. > >but when I run command in second time, it is another >error > >it shows the file not found! why? > >router#copy running-config tftp >Address or name of remote host []? 192.168.0.3 >Destination filename [router-confg]? >TFTP: error code 1 received - File not found > >Thank you > >Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list >[email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 72, Issue 31 >***************************************** _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
