Got some personal mails all in support of the stacking, saw only negative mails on the list, interesting... Price difference between 2x 3750 and a 6504 is not so small and a 6504 with one supervisor is still a single point of failure where a cluster of 2 switches would give me redundancy.
Everyone thanks for the answer, still not sure what we are going to do. Wim Holemans -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: maandag 17 november 2008 2:10 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Catalyst 3750 stacks with many members On Monday 17 November 2008 05:20:25 Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > As a result of that we do not put stacks any more. If we need more > ports we simply join them using ethernet cables (and etherchannels) > and manage independently of each other. It has always been my personal opinion that inter-switch trunking or migrating to a small, single-chassis, multi-line-card based platform (e.g., 6504-E) would offer far less headache than Stacking, and keep things simple. Given the feedback from folk on this thread so far, I think we did well to avoid stacks. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
