Hi all,

I'm in the process of building a data-centre aggregation layer using a pair of 6500s with a single Sup32 in each. I intend to run HSRP for customer VLANs south of the agg pair, and announce the data-centre prefixes into our iBGP towards the core (which are also route-reflectors). A picture is worth a thousand words and all that, so ASCII art time:

                        +--------------------+
                        |  to core (each agg |
                       /|   box connects to  |\     announce data-centre
                      / |   both core boxes  | \    prefixes from agg to
                     /  +--------------------+  \           core
                    /  /                      \  \           ^
                   /  /                        \  \          |
                 +------+                    +------+        |
Layer 3          |      |                    |      |        |
- - - - - - - - -| agg1 | - - - - - - - - - -| agg2 | - - - - - - - - -
Layer 2          |      |....etherchannel....|      |
                 +------+  <---- HSRP ---->  +------+
                         \                  /
                          \                /
                           +--------------+
                           | to L2 access |
                           |   switches   |
                           +--------------+

To keep things simple, let's assume that I'm using 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24 as data-centre prefixes, agg1 is the HSRP active router for 10.1.1.254, and the HSRP standby router for 10.1.2.254, and agg2 is the HSRP standby router for 10.1.1.254, and the HSRP active router for 10.1.2.254.

I need to inject both 10.1.1.0/24 and 10.1.2.0/24 into my iBGP. At steady state, agg1 will forward packets from 10.1.1.0/24 into the core, and agg2 will forward packets from 10.1.2.0/24 into the core.

To simplify troubleshooting, I'd like traffic flow between the access layer and the core to be as symmetric as possible. So, at steady state, the core will forward packets to 10.1.1.0/24 via agg1, and packet to 10.1.2.0/24 via agg2.

However, the purpose of HSRP is obviously to take care of things at other-than steady state! This is where I'm running into trouble. I either need to:

1. announce both prefixes into the core from both agg devices, and have the core prefer the announcement from the agg device that is currently the HSRP active router for a given prefix, or:

2. announce the prefix only from the agg device that is currently the HSRP active router for that prefix.

The latter option seems easy enough to do with conditional announcements, but that will track a route received from somewhere else (presumably the core). I could announce a dummy prefix from one agg device to the other; but I'd really like to inextricably link the announcement to the HSRP state somehow.

This seems like it should be a not-uncommon scenario. I've scoured a couple of Cisco documents - the Data Center Infrastructure Design Guide looked promising, but its solution was to get a CSM to inject static routes into the MSFC, and then redistribute those routes into the IGP. This seems overkill (seems a bit of a waste of a CSM), and I'd like to avoid this option if at all possible.

The other option I can see is to just not care about asymmetry from the core to the aggregation layer - but I'd also like to avoid this. Has anyone come across this before, and found a solution (or not!) similar to what I've described?

-Mike
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to