-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marlon,
you have an option of 1) static labels 2) bgp advertised labels (neighbor X send-label) 3) TE (rsvp) advertised labels. or 4) LDP/TDP I don't know what Juniper can do for you. BRs, - -mat 2008/11/23 Marlon Duksa : > Thanks Mat. That helps a lot. > But is there any way to select IP instead MPLS for forwarding witout ACLs. > Say that route x.x.x.x is received by OSPF and LDP (FEC mapping). Is there > any way to enable forwarding only on IP and not MPLS for that particular > route without ACLs. For example, changing preference (or administrative > cost) of OSPF to a lower value than LDP - something like that but on a per > interface basis. Or changing preference of LDP to a higher value on a global > basis. Juniper for example can change preference of LDP. > Thanks again, > Marlon > > - -- pgp-key 0x1C655CAB -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJKbfk+BuaDRxlXKsRAvOaAJ0bJwvt57kI4Cq+cFJUl7fZuLs4SwCeJfXb LNUrUxTjZ1tEGfSC6/PN6w0= =t14w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
