Yes, it seems subjective but is there possibly a general idea that can be provided? For now, I do not have give a detail plan, just introduce a general concept.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:56 AM, raymondh (NSP) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > It's very subjective to one's environment. > > > On Nov 25, 2008, at 10:53 PM, sheaujiun wrote: > > Hi, >> >> I have a customer in a DSLAM/BRAS environment where they have 4 main >> groups >> of Vlans assignments - Data, Voice, Management and Other services. >> >> Currently there is not fixed rules as to how vlan ids are assigned to the >> 4 >> main groups. It has come to a time the network has grown to a rather huge >> size and they are trying to reassign the vlan assignments. >> >> Generally, the network is as such: >> >> DSLAM --> aggregation switch --> BRAS >> >> Is there a standard guideline as to how vlan assignments are to be >> designed? >> What considerates are needed? >> e.g. Is there a need to consider how different vlans are to be terminated >> into the the aggregation switch if they are running VPLS? >> How the BRAS will handle the vlans coming from the aggregation? >> >> >> Sheau Jiun >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
