Let me explain my problem briefly.
While doing multi-home VPLS, if customer CE is Catalyst 2950 (not a
router). How do I protect L2 loop. Is there any mechanism other than STP
protection?
Regards,
Khara Nanda Luitel.
kharananda wrote:
..................... .....................
... MPLS PE ... MPLS Core .. MPLS PE ..
....................... ....................
- -
- -
- -
- -
- ------------------------- -
---------- Catalyst 2950 (CE)---------------------
---------------------------
Dear All,
Above is my network diagram. Being an ISP, I am willing to give
Redundant VPLS to customer (creating and binding vsi/vpls to CE
connected interface on PE) with the topology shown .
If I don't run STP protection for the loop between PEs and non-mpls
Catalyst 2950 (CE) shown in figure, is there any mechanism in VPLS
(like mac-withdrawal.etc) that defines these two arms of Cisco2950 to
be primary and secondary link thereby keeping one of the port of
2950 Catalyst in down state protecting the loop. And automatic switch
over for link failure.
Regards,
Khara Nanda Luitel.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/