I think you need DFC-enabled cards in order to use remote commands in them.
Also, in later IOS you can use "sh platform hard cap" to check a lot of stuff.
Besides that, "sh queueing interface" might give you some clues too.
--
Tassos
Roddy Strachan wrote on 10/12/2008 12:38:
Thanks
Doesn't seem to work though
#remote command module 2 sh proc cpu
Cannot remote to module 2
Do i need to enable something in the config?
-----Original Message-----
From: E. Versaevel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2008 7:46 PM
To: Roddy Strachan
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Utilization of a line card (7606)
Hi Roddy,
router#remote command module 1 show proc cpu sort
CPU utilization for five seconds: 4%/0%; one minute: 4%; five minutes:
4%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
121 163451056 328079970 498 4.39% 4.32% 4.33% 0 fw_lcp
process
2 824 750462 1 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 Load
Meter
(although this is a WS-X6724-SFP)
Kind regards,
Erik Versaevel
ps, any idea what the fw_lcp process is?
Roddy Strachan schreef:
Hey guys,
Hoping someone can help.
Is there any command to check the utilisation of a specific card
within
a 7606?
Or lets be more specific, I suspect a line card in the router is
overloaded and causing the CPU to spike, is there any way to find out
how much utilisation that card is using to check to see if we are over
subscribing it or not ?
The card model in question is a WS-X6148A-GE-TX which I believe has no
dedicated packet processor like a SIP-400/SPA so therefore it punts
everything to the CPU.
Thanks
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received
this
email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please note
that
any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for
the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Erik Versaevel
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.16/1840 - Release Date:
9/12/2008 4:53 PM
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
