IIRC you had to buy a license to run it and I think we stopped selling them and taking a faster CPU path route along with hardware forwarding (ASR1000 for example).
Generally, I don't think it's recommended because so many features were not supported with it. Rodney On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:05:26AM -0800, Chris Flav wrote: > Hi all, > > we currently utilize Cisco 7204VXR routers for PPPoE aggregation and are > interested in testing the MPF feature. > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/ios/12_3/12_3y/12_3ya8/MPF123YM.html > > A little while ago we tested c7200-i12s-mz.123-14.YM12.bin and had to do an > emergency rollback since RADIUS profiles that utilized Framed-Route such as: > > Framed-Address = 10.131.131.96, > Framed-Route = "72.131.131.96/29 0.0.0.0 1", > > would not route correctly the netblock in question. Sessions would come up > however the routes were not correctly utilized by traffic flows. > > Therefore, are any utilizing MPF successfully, and as well, what is the > recommended IOS for the 7204VXR+NPE-G1 platform for PPPoE termination over > L2TP? What are IOS recommendations for this application and platform? We > currently handle approximately 2500 PPPoE users per box. > > Thanks in advance, > > C. Flav > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! > > http://www.flickr.com/gift/ > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
