Rado,

Thanks for the reply. That's a very useful doc. In my particular situation I'm trying to set the MTU on an Ethernet sub-interface. It would appear that this isn't possible (though it would be useful if one could at least fake it and get the VC up when you know that closer to the edge you're taking care of enforcing a set MTU. That doc will definitely come in handy though.

Thanks for the input
 Justin


Rado Vasilev wrote:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_any_transport_ps6350_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1187367



On 18 Jan 2009, at 02:31, Chris Phillips wrote:

Rado,

nyc1(config)#int te1/2.1254
nyc1(config-subif)#mtu ?
 <9216-9216>  MTU size in bytes

nyc1(config-subif)#mtu 9216 ?
 <cr>

nyc1(config-subif)#mtu 9216
% Sub-interface TenGigabitEthernet1/2.1254 does not support user settable mtu

Afaik, all sub-interfaces assume the MTU of the primary physical port, and that this cannot be changed.

Rado Vasilev wrote:
Justin,
You should be able to fix the MTU mismatch issue without changing the interface/sub-interface MTU.
conf t
interface xxx/x.10
xconnect ..
   mtu xxx
regards,
Rado
On 18 Jan 2009, at 01:41, Justin Shore wrote:
Chris Phillips wrote:
The MTU definitely needs to be the same, in my experience. However, I am somewhat new to MPLS and am very much still in the learning process. But, that would be the first thing that I would change.

I'm in the same boat for L2VPNs. I have somewhat better knowledge of L3VPNs at this point. We're just now really diving into L2VPNs.

I did change the MTU and that fixed it. That presents a design issue for me which I detailed in a self-reply to the list. I'm now trying to figure out what best practice is for EoMPLS on sub-ints when the sub-int involves customer and infrastructure VLANs. The best answer may be to not mix them. Thoughts?

Thanks
Justin

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

--
Chris Phillips
Senior IP Engineer & Peering Coordinator
WBS Connect
[email protected]
(866) WBS-CONX
(720) 259-8361 - direct
(303) 968-4383 - mobile
www.wbsconnect.com
www.wbstoday.com blog

Ranked #1 as the "Fastest Growing privately held company in Colorado"
- 2008 Denver Business Journal -

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to