After choosing whatever prefered method, wouldn't these BGP sessions need to be re-established to take effect? (since MSS is only carried in SYN and SYN/ACKs) And shouldn't u account for TCP/IP overhead? (just being lazy by not testing this in lab)
/Jose 2009/2/11 Łukasz Bromirski <[email protected]> > On 2009-02-11 20:24, Justin Shore wrote: > > So how do one force iBGP sessions to choose a larger datagram size? Do >> you have to do it in the BGP config with 'neighbor a.b.c.d transport >> path-mtu-discovery' or is there a more automatic solution? >> > > 'ip tcp path-mtu-discovery' global command or the one You mentioned > for per-neighbor tuning. > > -- > "Don't expect me to cry for all the | Łukasz Bromirski > reasons you had to die" -- Kurt Cobain | http://lukasz.bromirski.net > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
